Pro-life activists are accustomed to shrill accusations that they only care about human life before birth – that they won’t lift a finger to help those already born and their moms. That’s nonsense, of course, as demonstrated by the vast network of centers catering to pregnant women facing challenging life circumstances, let alone the many charitable organizations that aid and advocate for those in need.
Yet the myth persists, not the least because it’s amplified and spread by abortion’s supporters, especially in the media. The myth is undergirded by the subtle manipulation of language – like referring to pro-life activists as anti-choice or opposed to reproductive rights. “Against ‘choice’ and ‘rights?’,” someone might say. “That doesn’t sound very American!” Or how about the name of the nation’s biggest abortion provider: Planned Parenthood. Shouldn’t pro-lifers be in favor of “parenthood”? And “planning” for it seems reasonable enough, right?
These kinds of insidious word games are not restricted to beginning of life issues, for they occur at the end of life as well and with increasing frequency. Even the English word “euthanasia” literally translates from the Greek as “happy” or “easy” death, but, since the 19th century, it has come to connote mercy killing – nothing happy or easy in that.
Jumping ahead to today, we’re hearing a lot about Medical Assistance in Dying – or, euphemistically, MAiD, as the Canadians blithely call it. Here’s another swamp of manipulative language and ideas, for MAiD in practice isn’t just assistance in dying, but mainly assistance to die – either through assisted suicide or, increasingly, through outright medicalized killing.
On the surface, the euphemistic MAiD program sounds like a virtuous thing – who wouldn’t want to provide medical assistance to the dying? Indeed, MAiD seems like it would dovetail nicely with a “good death” – a death characterized by comfort and symptom management as well as holistic healing at all levels including emotional, relational, and spiritual. Such a death is the target outcome for hospice care, but hospice care, when administered ethically, does not hasten that good death, but only facilitates it.
The reality is that MAiD is a death factory. Since 2016, over 70,000 Canadians have been euthanized, and MAiD now accounts for around 5% of all deaths in the country. And these aren’t just Canadians who were already facing a reasonably foreseeable death, but many whose natural death wasn’t imminent at all.
So how do we respond? To begin with, we have to forcefully reject the insinuation that we, as pro-life nurses, are somehow against fostering a good death for our dying patients. Instead, we must clarify that we’re fully committed to aggressive symptom management, including pain control, as well as facilitating every dimension of healing possible at the end of life.
Simultaneously, we must make it clear – through both word and deed – that we resolutely refuse to cooperate with any actions that intentionally hasten anyone’s death. We have to speak up when we suspect that such actions are being taken, and we must be ready to suffer the consequences when our objections and non-cooperation threaten our jobs. Courage.
______________________________
A version of this commentary appeared in the Summer 2026 edition of PulseLine, a publication of the National Association of Pro-Life Nurses.










